Chapter-2, Section -4, POSH ACT

 Section 4 of the POSH Act, 2013(The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013) deals with the Constitution of the Internal Committee (IC) in a workplace.

Let’s dive into Section 4 of the Posh Act, which is all about preventing sexual harassment at the workplace. This section emphasizes the employer's duty to provide a safe environment. It’s not just about having a policy; it’s about actively ensuring that employees feel secure and respected. 

Take the landmark case of Vishaka vs. State of Rajasthan. Here, the Supreme Court laid down guidelines that became the foundation for the Posh Act. The court highlighted that sexual harassment is a violation of fundamental rights, and employers must take proactive steps to address it. 

---CHAPTER II

CONSTITUTION h INTERNAL COMPLAINTS COMMITTEE

Sec. -4: Constitution of Internal Complaints Committee.

 📘 **POSH Act - Section 4: Constitution of Internal complaints Committee

**Key Provisions:**

1. Applicability: Every employer of a workplace with 10 or more employees must constitute an Internal Committee.

2. Composition of the ICC:

🔹Presiding Officer: A senior-level woman employee shall be the Presiding Officer.

🔹Two or more members: From among the employees, preferably committed to the cause of women or who have experience in social work or legal knowledge.

🔹External Member: One member from an NGO or association committed to the cause of women or familiar with issues relating to sexual harassment.

3. Gender Representation: At least one-half of the total members of the IC should be women.

4. Tenure: Members shall hold office for a period not exceeding three years, from the date of their nomination.

Purpose of Section 4

➡️ Ensures that there's a mechanism within the organization for dealing with complaints of sexual harassment.

➡️ Brings neutrality by including an external member.

➡️ Encourages women participation and leadership by mandating a woman as the Presiding Officer.

Importance of Section 4:

➡️ Legitimizes the IC to conduct inquiries.

➡️ Ensures representation and independence.

➡️ Prevents misuse by including an external, neutral party.

➡️ Failure to constitute a valid IC can lead to:

🔹 Inquiry being declared invalid.

🔹Employer facing legal action or penalties.

⚖️ **Important Case Laws on Section 4**

Vishaka & Others v. State of Rajasthan (1997)

➡️ Though predating the POSH Act, this Supreme Court judgment laid the "foundation" for the POSH Act and the concept of ICs.

➡️ The Court directed all workplaces to set up complaints committees — this directive evolved into Section 4 of the POSH Act.

Must watch:- Chapter-2 section-4, posh act

Medha Kotwal Lele v. Union of India (2012)

➡️ The Supreme Court observed "non-compliance" by many organizations with Vishaka guidelines.

➡️ It emphasized the "need for accountability" and led to the recommendation of statutory backing, which became the POSH Act, including Section 4.

Sanjeev Mishra v. Bank of Baroda (2021)

➡️ The IC was challenged for "bias and improper constitution".

➡️ The Court ruled that an improperly constituted IC "vitiates the inquiry process".

➡️ Reinforces the importance of proper constitution as per Section 4.

Global Health Private Ltd. v. Local Complaints Committee, District Indore & Ors (2021)

➡️ Issue: The employer didn’t constitute an Internal Committee (IC).

➡️ Ruling: Madhya Pradesh High Court held that "non-constitution of the IC is a violation of Section 4", and the "Local Complaints Committee (LCC)" can step in.

➡️ Significance: Emphasized the mandatory nature of setting up an IC under Section 4.

Dr. Punita K. Sodhi v. Union of India (2010)(pre-2013, but relevant)

➡️Delhi High Court observed that "internal inquiries must follow due process", and that the composition of the committee must be unbiased and compliant with guidelines (based on Vishaka guidelines, which preceded POSH Act).

➡️Importance: Reinforces the rationale behind Section 4.

Ayesha Khatun v. The State of West Bengal (2021)

➡️ The organization "constituted an IC without an external member".

➡️ Calcutta High Court held this was "non-compliant with Section 4".

➡️ Takeaway: External member’s inclusion is not optional.

Contact us 

Any Query or Any Other Legal Query

Contact us :-8375096958

Neelam